Discussion in 'Off-Topic Forum' started by CDsDontBurn, Dec 8, 2006.
Found a name for that beach babe from March 16th? :taste:
Nope.. but here's the rest of them:
these aren't color fixed or touched up like the others two..
Ugh, why do they have to ruin a perfectly good looking girl by retouching her up in photoshop untill she looks like her skin was made out of plastic. I hope its not just me, but its just sucha turn off. I cant attach any personality to someone looking like that and without personality I might as well be staring at photos of mannequins dressedup (or dressed down...).
I never understood how homophobic men find beauty in photos like most of the one in this thread. Considering with all the retouching the girls end up looking like transvestites. Guess I just like women with a little bit more curves, instead of skinny girls with abnormaly large breasts in comparisson to rest of their body.
Heh.. what a thread killer.
I think I know what you mean about the retouching.. I hate that overdone fuzzy blur effect some "wallpaper guy's" do thinking it's all that. I perfer a non-touched up photo over some photoshop geek going to town with all the neat effects Photoshop can do. I don't recall ever posting a shot like that on this thread.. (and that's alot) Regarding skinny girls.. I consider runway models so scary skinny that its replusive. I don't recall any Nicole Richie in this thread either.
ps.. I kinda take offense to being labeled a homophobe. I am not prejudiced against gay people, and you assuming we all are, is offensive as well.
Guess I worded myself a bit badly, wasnt my intention to make any feel like I was labeling them as a homophobe. Just that the sort of heavy retouching is often used on various sleazy porn mags or mens magazines, which often have a sort of manly man feel to it.
I think the whole modeling world is extremely shallow and unrealistic. Ive done some modelling myself as well as taking photos. And no matter how much makeup you add, youll never end up looking like most of the girls in this thread without some retouching.
Most of the retouching is done on the cheeks, forehead, under/around the eyes, lips, arms, legs, chin, breasts... well you get the idea, how much of the model is actually left!?
Some of the photos you posted have some retouching, not nearly as bad and hard to detect for a untrainted eye or someone whos never used photoshop. But the models dont look anything near that in real world so what beauty are we really admiring? Another effect is that the heavy retouching makes the women look like 14 year old girls. Its artificial and I personally feel repulsed at myself if I find myself being attracted by it. Ill admit most of the girls in the photos are really hot, but the photos are fake and god knows what they done with their bodies to look like that in the first place.
Another thing is how most models are required to look skinny, especially the legs and arms. Those are completely unrealistic ideals, most women do not have skinny legs and ties. The female body stores most of its fat on the ties, its because mother nature intended women to carry babies and for that they need strong ties/legs. The body breaks down that fat into proteins for the child when the mother is not able to get hold of food for shorter periods of time.
Thats why most men find the female buttocks area attractive, its instincts that helps us pick up a "fit" mother for our offspring.
The current ideals however are exactly the opposite, long slim legs. Which are actually most common for men, we have naturally slimmer and longer legs. The movie industry actually uses standin male models for some actresses on leg shots, because the most slim legs are often male, thats how twisted the current ideals are. Nowdays in the era of plastic surgery anyone can shape their body to whatever they want though, so its not as common as during the 90s. Most of the big actresses have body doubles to handle that sorta thing though, they are rich enough to not have to do that to their bodies.
the thread starter must post his own pix from time to time .
cds who is that first girl cause i wanna do her!!!
lol. i dunno. i found her google though .
I see one of my custom jobs there Cd's .. glad you liked it.
Here's some new Halle:
Speaking of Keeley Hazell... that homemade porno of hers.. truely something to behold. :drool:
Two decent Sienna Miller pics:
what are you talking about? it was lame!
I was being sarcastic, Gem.
Bad sarcasm.. but... still...
Time for resurrection...
Cheerleader from HEROS, Hayden Panettiere
Separate names with a comma.