Futuremark 3DMark Results

I changed my graphics card, so I guess I had to make one of these. All seems to be well.



link

 

This is with a fresh installation of the AMD 15.3 BETA drivers.....

 

This is my latest result after updating 3DMark and also upgrading to Windows 10 x64. The PC specs are all the same as before...

 

Run with the new AMD Crimson Drivers....

 

This is the first run with my new XFX AMD R-390

 

What do you score in the directc 12 and mantle tests

 

I don't have the Advanced version of 3DMark....so.....

Running the Oxide Star Swarm Mantle Stress Test...this is the output text....
______________________________________________________

== Hardware Configuration =================================
GPU: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
CPU: GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Physical Cores: 4
Logical Cores: 8
Physical Memory: 16054423552
Allocatable Memory: 140737488224256
===========================================================


== Configuration ==========================================
API: Mantle
Scenario: ScenarioFollow.csv
User Input: Disabled
Resolution: 1920x1080
Fullscreen: True
GameCore Update: 16.6 ms
Bloom Quality: High
PointLight Quality: High
ToneCurve Quality: High
Glare Overdraw: 16
Shading Samples: 64
Shade Quality: Mid
Deferred Contexts (D3D11): Disabled
Small Batch Optimized (Mantle): Enabled
Temporal AA Duration: 16
Temporal AA Time Slice: 2
Detailed Frame Info: Off
===========================================================


== Results ================================================
Test Duration: 360 Seconds
Total Frames: 24253

Average FPS: 67.36
Average Unit Count: 4569
Maximum Unit Count: 5759
Average Batches/MS: 1322.91
Maximum Batches/MS: 6671.98
Average Batch Count: 19928
Maximum Batch Count: 144702
===========================================================

 

This is the D3D result....
___________________________________________

===========================================================

== Hardware Configuration =================================
GPU: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
CPU: GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Physical Cores: 4
Logical Cores: 8
Physical Memory: 16054423552
Allocatable Memory: 140737488224256
===========================================================


== Configuration ==========================================
API: DirectX
Scenario: ScenarioFollow.csv
User Input: Disabled
Resolution: 1920x1080
Fullscreen: True
GameCore Update: 16.6 ms
Bloom Quality: High
PointLight Quality: High
ToneCurve Quality: High
Glare Overdraw: 16
Shading Samples: 64
Shade Quality: Mid
Deferred Contexts (D3D11): Disabled
Small Batch Optimized (Mantle): Enabled
Temporal AA Duration: 16
Temporal AA Time Slice: 2
Detailed Frame Info: Off
===========================================================


== Results ================================================
Test Duration: 360 Seconds
Total Frames: 17513

Average FPS: 48.64
Average Unit Count: 4130
Maximum Unit Count: 5327
Average Batches/MS: 722.84
Maximum Batches/MS: 2051.59
Average Batch Count: 17270
Maximum Batch Count: 155137
===========================================================

 

I hadn't run this in a while. It didn't seem to want to update for some reason.

Online results

 

pumping out some serious frames with those 2x 980's..... how does the ultra version of firestrike perform though?

 

I would test but I'm using the free version.

 

Same here.

 

Since you can get the Advanced Version through Steam at 80% off ($4.99 total) I went ahead and got it. This result is the first run. But, I also had a second screen active in extended Desktop...if that matters at all.



Here is the 2nd Run with only the single monitor active....

 

Here is Firestrike...the test for a single monitor... (I'll run the Ultimate for 4K in a while.)

 

nice

 

Firestrike-Ultra: For testing 4K... (Looks like my system needs some help for the heavy lifting)

It was a slideshow all the way through.

 

it would LOVE for 3dmark to re-release the firestrike test using dx12/mantle.... even with tripling the gpu power firestrike doesn't seem to take much of a bump which to me... seems like a limitation of the api with so many things occuring on screen.

 

This is what happens when i put a R9 285 2GB Stock + R9 380x 4GB Stock together...

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/9605843

 

Additionally... i've determined that firestrike 4K REQUIRES a minimum of 3gb if not 4gb of vram...

if i run the firestrike 4K tests with crossfire... there is serious hitching... if i disable the 285 and run the 380x then the hitching is gone and my results are much better plus the tests look proper... If i run the 285 without the 380x..... the hitching is bad and the frame rate rately makes it above 0.1-0.5... in fact it looks like things freeze up and far as i can tell that's due to insufficient vram.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/9605949?
285+380x=