zeropoint66.97 x xtremeg66.67

i don't want to start a war but at least for my system these drivers are the best .they r really good i'd like to know what do i guys think bout it ?wich one is the best?

 

I would say they are both great drivers. Both do a great job. I would say use the one that works best for you on your rig. There both top notch drivers.

Myself I use the Zeropoint but the XtremeG is very good too.

 

just out of curius did you mean the Xtreme G 67.66?

 

yes 67.66 im sorry bout that

 

well, both are quite good, as z3r0 said. I personally spend too much time within the zer0points to bring myself to use anythign else :lol: but I do have a great deal of respect for the Xtreme G guys and their work. It's all about choices and giving users the best possible options

 

Thx for that man both Jrd1st and i try our best. I havent had the honor of trying your drivers yet but i will and possibly post a comparison between them when i get more time

 

good times. I'd almost bet money you win at 3dmark though :lol:


...I hate that program and all it's embedded code lines...grrrr

 

I spend too much time working on our drivers to do a head to head comparison however in the past I've used the ExtremeG drivers and always liked them, hell Daishi and JRD1st were one of the inspirations to get into this, I hope either way you go you'd be satisfied as I know both groups put in a lot of effort to make great drivers....

 

I'll bet a quarter you guys take 3dmark.....

 

Oh...them's fighting words! :lol:

 

We really do not work on 3dmark scores as the gaming smoothness speaks for itself.

 

Having tried both xtreme g 67.66 and the zer0point 66.97, I will tell you I didn't switch back to the xtreme g 67.66's!

 

lol...it depends on the card.....we take 6800s into special consideration not because we like them more, but both me and Drew have 6800s :lol:

 

Also, benchmarks dont take into account the IQ improvements in both ZP and XG drivers, I must admit I havent used XG drivers for a while now (Im somewhat "tied" to a certain beta program heheh ) but they are very good, As are ZP, but a comparsion would be silly.

Nice fence btw, Im staying on it

 

....don't make me get the truck/whinch out.....


but seriously, both are stellar drivers.

I'm sure I can speak for Daishi/JRd1st as well when I say that so long as we make people happy and they find a driver they like, we've done our job.

 

Hehehe! Excellent thread! I have run both the XG's 67.66a and the ZP's 66.97. I am having a tough time deciding which I like the best! They are both great choices. I have a Chaintech 6600 GT.

I do mostly Flight Sims and FPSers. With VSYNC enabled, my Acer 1912 LCD limits the FR's to 75. I think that system specifics are the key. If I had a CRT capable of higher refresh rates I might find a difference. As it is, I can't see any......

Salute to both XG and ZP. Great work both!
Decon

 

I used extreme g's when I firstly got my gf6600gt and everytime I found bug of any sort, I crawl to zeropoints. Once new extreme g was out, I was using again until I found a bug, then back to zeropoints, repeat...

Then I started using DNA and helped them a bit, but now safely back into zeropoints. My heart flows with the zer0 now.. Awesome work!

 

Been using Daishi's XG drivers for a few releases and they have been spot on, last ones i had 65. something were good and stable, just a tad on th slow side from his prvious version i had used. Gave the DH ZP's a go lastnight, speed is very nice, but having some issues which i created a thread on. Both are very good, and I have to say with everyone making stellar driver releases gamers and the like should be happy.


Omega Nvidia/AT
Unian ATI Catalyst Drivers
DH ZP drivers
XG Drivers
Stationpoint and so on.


All of you keep up the goodwork. If i left any out, pat yourself on the back, I'm just unable to remember a lot of things right now(stupid Abit IC7-G chipset fan kept me up all night going BBZZTT WRRAARRRR sounds )

can't wait for my swiftech chipset cooler and XP-90 HS to arrive, end my suffering!

 

Before the zer0point drivers were around, I used the XG drivers. Haven't gone back since.

 

Very good point That's why 3DMarks are sometimes called cow-marks :rofl:


But now, guys, who think that can manage to give me THIS:



...instead of THIS...???




More comparsions there:
http://trodas.wz.cz/g.php?p=detonators&d=1&v=v2

Now - anyone who dare? :taste: